Via moonbattery:
And yes the paper has a fold in it. The real headline: UAW talks shift to Ford. The above folded headline is more representative of reality though. After all, the UAW negotiated its contract with itself (part-owner of GM) and is imposing those terms onto Ford. How that is not racketeering is beyond me...
Tampilkan postingan dengan label UAW. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label UAW. Tampilkan semua postingan
Minggu, 25 September 2011
Senin, 19 September 2011
GM owner UAW negtiated $5k signing bonuses WITH ITSELF, will impose same on Ford
The pattern for as long as I can remember here in the Detroit area is that the UAW negotiates a contract with one of the big-3, and then imposes that contract on the other two. The difference this go around is that the UAW owns GM. In that regard, they've 'negotiated' a contract with themselves, including $5,000 'signing bonuses' to the rank and file at taxpayer expense (I'll get to that part in a moment), and I'm sure will proceed to simply copy that onto their competitor Ford. From the AP: GM, UAW agree on profit-sharing in new contract
If the US Justice Department were worth its salt (its not), they would file racketeering charges against the UAW for this absurdity of negotiating with itself to impose a contract onto Ford.
UPDATE: Via Instapundit:
UPDATE #2: Via The Detroit Free Press: UAW to release details of GM deal Tuesday; analyst calls pact partial victory for both sides. Both sides? The UAW sits on both! There are no two sides!!!
The United Auto Workers union won $5,000 signing bonuses and the possibility of sweeter profit-sharing checks as part of a new four-year contract with General Motors Co., two people briefed on the talks said Saturday.The other side of this turd sandwich is that 100% of GM profit are really US taxpayer bailout dollars. GM makes no real profit. It only looks that way on paper because of an Obama mind trick. There's in fact a backdoor bailout that the media continues to refuse to cover: Government Motors, Dems, Obama celebrate first quarter profits made up entirely of backdoor taxpayer bailout that the press still refuses to report. I'll summarize the backdoor bailout in two prior posts:
The deal, which was reached late Friday, also includes a $2- to $3-per-hour pay raise for entry-level workers over the life of the contract and guarantees more union jobs, the people said.
- Bailout: GM only earned a 'profit' on paper because of $45 billion backdoor taxpayer bailout that the establishment MSM isn't reporting
- Detroit News spews Obama propaganda: Feds to recoup $36 billion in bailout money, fail to mention GM receiving $45 billion tax furlough
If the US Justice Department were worth its salt (its not), they would file racketeering charges against the UAW for this absurdity of negotiating with itself to impose a contract onto Ford.
UPDATE: Via Instapundit:
The only point Kaus misses is that the workers and the bosses are one and the same in this case. They have literally negotiated with themselves more taxpayer loot!MICKEY KAUS: Why Not Pay Back Taxpayers First? “I’m sure there are sophisticated arguments for why the UAW members shouldn’t pay back the taxpayers who bailed their employer out of bankruptcy before they negotiate a deal that gives them each a $5,000 bonus. I just can’t think of them right now. … Just from a PR standpoint, repaying the debt would seem like a good idea. . . . It’s one thing to give workers power to negotiate above-market wages through collective bargaining–hey, let them squeeze the bosses for all the bosses can bear. It’s another thing when they squeeze more than the bosses can bear, the bosses go broke, and ordinary citizens, many poorer than UAW members, have to make up the difference. After that, why let the UAW continue to extract Wagner Act wages as if nothing happened?”
UPDATE #2: Via The Detroit Free Press: UAW to release details of GM deal Tuesday; analyst calls pact partial victory for both sides. Both sides? The UAW sits on both! There are no two sides!!!
Sabtu, 03 September 2011
Shocker: GM, Chryler owner UAW leans toward Ford strike, "GM, Chrysler emerging as favorites to finish UAW contract talks first"
How exactly is this not racketeering? Obama gave the UAW a big chunk of ownership in GM and Chrysler at taxpayer expense, and now that same UAW is muscling GM and Chrysler competitor Ford Motor Company: UAW leans toward Ford strike
The United Auto Workers union has a strong mandate to strike Ford Motor Co. if an acceptable new labor agreement is not reached when the current contract expires Sept. 14.How could they strike GM and Chrysler anyway since they are part owners? Would the UAW strike against the UAW? Of course not. Ford is in essence getting punished for not putting themselves into Obama's, and the UAW's, hands. Speaking of:
Locals representing about 41,000 hourly Ford workers were asked to complete their votes by Friday. Locals are reporting 97 percent or higher of the membership has authorized UAW leadership to strike if necessary.
...Ford is the only Detroit automaker the UAW can strike. General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group LLC have no-strike clauses from bankruptcy restructuring.
Bargaining with GM and Chrysler is pacing ahead of Ford, with teams working weekends and big issues on the table. The expectation is the larger GM will set terms that Chrysler will be expected to meet. Ford teams are working long days, but talks are not expected to intensify until after the Labor Day weekend.So the UAW is essentially negotiating with itself via GM and Chrysler,and whatever they come up with will simply be imposed on Ford. Um - how is that not racketeering? Also, from The Detroit Free Press: GM, Chrysler emerging as favorites to finish UAW contract talks first. Shocked as hell, no?
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)

