Flashback video: US Rep John Dingell (D-MI) says 'take 'em out' is violent rhetoric

What is Dingell saying today after all of this has been going on?:

• Video: DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz Refuses To Comment On Jim Hoffa After Hoffa Declares ‘War’ on Tea Party ‘Sons-Of-Bitches’ 
• Video: Obama Declares He’s ‘Proud’ of Jim Hoffa After Hoffa Declares ‘War’ on Tea Party ‘Sons-Of-Bitches’ 
• The 'New Civility' (Cont'd): Bob Beckel: "Sometimes You Have To Take It To Those ‘Sons-Of-Bitches’" 
• Ed Schultz: It's about time Jim Hoffa came out and declared ‘War’ on Tea Party ‘Sons-Of-Bitches'. "I Love It" 
• Same Obama WH that called for 'new civility' says no comment about Jim Hoffa's ‘War’ on Tea Party ‘Sons-Of-Bitches’ comments

Just mere months ago, Dingell insisted that, among other phrases, 'take 'em out' was violent rhetoric and has no place in public discourse (from a prior post of mine. HT: The Michigan View for the reminder):

Of course, Dingell is no stranger to violent rhetoric himself: John Dingell (D-MI) again repeats the lie: rhetoric has created "a hideous unproductive climate which I think is very dangerous." Flashback: Dingell called radio host terrorist last year, likened tea party to KKK. So where is Dingell on the Jim Hoffa comments? Dingell has his head buried in the sand, same as the moonbat messiah: Flashback Video: Obama scolded America for political rhetoric that "wounds" instead of heals